From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nom. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 05:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Will Wikle

Will Wikle (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

judging by the sources subject doesn't qualify as notable, the sources are not enough to prove notability (2 very similar interviews). AlejandroLeloirRey ( talk) 16:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply

I am withdrawing the nomination -- AlejandroLeloirRey ( talk) 18:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:46, 9 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • look, I am happy if you can find sources but you should go though it and find some that are relevant and that prove notability. I am not surprised that a porn actor name on google returns a lot of results but we need only "good" results. it is not how many times your name was on an article, it's more to get a reliable second source. -- AlejandroLeloirRey ( talk) 17:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep as per sources in the article, Meets BASIC. – Davey2010 Talk 13:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC) reply
  • comment I gave another look to the sources (are there more sources now?) and his name is only, and ever, associated to big-brother. if u did a reality tv show is quite normal to have a few interviews and a few short bios in big-brother related pages. apart from big-brother he didn't seem to have done anything "memorable" nor in porn nor in other fields. The question is, as I don't know, what is wikipedia policy for reality's competitors? I stongly belive that those sources proves that the only reason why he could be here is as a reality competitor. -- AlejandroLeloirRey ( talk) 10:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The EW mention is about a different TV show, and the Attitude Magazine and Huffington Post are anout the porn film. His coverage always memtions Big Brother because that's how he became well known, but it has been sustained over time because he's done other things to remain in public attention. -- Toughpigs ( talk) 14:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC) reply
@ Toughpigs:I am satisfied with your answer, how can i delete my proposal for deletion? thank you.-- AlejandroLeloirRey ( talk) 14:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC) reply
@ AlejandroLeloirRey: You can just say that you're withdrawing the nomination. You can put that at the top, in bold so that the closer sees that you want to drop it. —  Toughpigs ( talk) 17:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.