From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 23:01, 18 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Will Amos (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Election candidates are not notable as per WP:NPOL. See previous discussions here. FUNgus guy ( talk) 23:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Unelected candidates for office do not qualify for Wikipedia articles per WP:NPOL — if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced case that he was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article before he was named a candidate, then he does not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until he wins the election. Delete, without prejudice against recreation on or after October 19 if he wins. Bearcat ( talk) 00:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Wikipedia is not a free host for election campaigns, no other claim of notability in the article Kraxler ( talk) 20:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Unelected candidate. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 12:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete no stated claim to notability, fails WP:NPOL. Just in case someone thinks that this article has not seen enough discussion. -- Bejnar ( talk) 00:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.