The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Advice to
Doc James: I understand that you are a doctor and so I am but it doesnot mean that we have to keep fighting for projects which are not notable on WIkipedia. I agree that they may be notable in the medical field but they doesnot meet the Wikipedia guidlines!
Burhan Ahmed |
Penny for your thoughts? 18:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment There is absolutely no evidence that Doc James has a conflict of interest. There is evidence, however, that the nominator does (as demonstrated in Doc James' comment below). Polyamorph (
talk)19:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete is my vote. This article uses self-published sources (WikiDoc own site), poorly establishes notability, and is argumentative (example: "WikiDoc differs from Wikipedia in the following ways"). I have no comment regarding the new merge suggestion. —fcsuper (
How's That?,
That's How!)(
ExclusionisticImmediatist ) —05:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)reply
KeepMerge and redirect per Doc James, there are independent 3rd party sources available for this site, some of which are already cited. Merging with the articles on other similar sites is an option although they are seperate entities.Polyamorph (
talk)18:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, unless I'm missing something. Of the five sources in the article, only three are independent, and not one offers significant coverage - the
ABC News piece, for example, devotes only 40 words to them while discussing the general topic of medical information online. I tried four or five different searches to find more convincing sources, and
these two News results were as good as it got. Not quite enough under
WP:GNG I'm afraid.
Alzarian16 (
talk)
11:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.