The result was no consensus. - Mailer Dia b lo 22:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC) reply
An advertisement that fails to conform to neutral point of view. Victoriagirl 06:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep: My nomination was based on the belief that the entry was an "advertisement that fail[ed] to conform to neutral point of view". The entry has since been changed and the concerns are no longer valid.-- Victoriagirl 00:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately none of you understand how the movie industry works. When you submit a screenplay (and mine is in their hands now), most screenwriters will sign a non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement. This protects the producer from having their projects stolen until they have committed to it financially and are ready to release that info. So I am simply not authorized to release the name of said producer. My publisher on the other hand is fully aware of the arrangements between me and this Canadian producer as Kunati initially wanted movie rights and I could not give it to them. It has been documented all over the internet that a screenplay was in the works and that a producer requested it. I won't jeopardize my chances at a movie over a request for a citation that you deem viable. There already is a web link that backs up my claim. If this producer releases me from the agreement, their company name will go up immediately.( Cherylktardif 15:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)) reply