- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Given the limited discussion here, I gave a strong look at the previous AfD, which closed as Keep. However, the sources accepted by some editors in that discussion seem very weak, so I do not take it as good reason to doubt the consensus to delete. RL0919 ( talk) 02:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Weyoun ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor Star Trek character. I can't find any in-depth analysis that's not a pure WP:PLOT summary or in-passing (I'll stress that sources presented in last AfD, not used to improve this article, did not contain any analysis beyond maybe a sentence or so, and seemed to be just plot summaries). Seems to fail WP:GNG/NFICTION. Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - If the only means of reception is a listicle (an extremely focused on at that), the article doesn't need to exist. TTN ( talk) 12:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.