The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: While other animal homes and refuges have pages on Wikipedia, all have some substantial content and notability. This one fails GNG. --
Whiteguru (
talk)
09:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes, part of their history included a person who was involved in wildlife rescue, but that person is no longer associated with the group and licenses are required to continue the wildlife activities, so the activity was dropped... though the name remained the same. And they were small enough to be unable to secure and keep a brick-and-mortar property for ordinary animal shelter activities. Yes, a rented office in town plus limited foster-based animal care is all that is left. Was never really notable. Most of these "animal shelter" articles in Wikipedia are just "directory entries" of non-notable organizations.
Normal Op (
talk)
02:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails WP:NCORP per editor JLAN - "is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."
William Harris (talk)09:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.