- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) 4meter4 ( talk) 05:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Westerleigh Junction ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Railway junctions generally do not warrant their own articles. Clearly fails WP:GNG as a relatively unknown location, with only 3 references, including one from 1992. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 17:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and England. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 17:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for now. A quick search on British Newspaper Archive found articles before the 1900s, such as this one from 1866, so there may be more to this than is included at the moment. Garuda3 ( talk) 13:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, notable junction, could do with more cites, not reason enough for deletion though. Rossonwy ( talk) 03:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The subject is not sourced like Golden Gates, however the general notability is met in general. -- Loewstisch ( talk) 09:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.