The result was Speedy Keep - both withdrawn and SNOW. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 18:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This is an article about an engine which doesn't exist. One researcher has published some ideas and is doing some experiments which have caught the interest of the popular press and blogs, but it doesn't appear anybody has actually built one of these yet. When they do, wikipedia will need an article on it. Since it doesn't currently exist, neither should this article.
WP:FUTURE --
RoySmith
(talk)
14:58, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
I still think we don't need this article, but it's clear that I'm alone in that opinion, so nomination withdrawn. No need to waste people's time on a debate whose outcome is already obvious. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Keep —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.168.196.129 ( talk) 15:25, 9 April 2011 (UTC) reply
This AfD is, for all intents and purposes, over. The nomination has been withdrawn and there are no outstanding delete !votes. We are simply waiting for somebody to close the discussion. If you are here intending to !vote keep you may wish to consider that unless you have a new and compelling reason, there isn't an awful lot of point in you doing so. Bob House 884 ( talk) 00:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC) reply