The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.—
Quarl(
talk) 2007-01-03 07:30Z
Comment there are over 23,000 ghits for "WTFPL license"
[1], so there is some notability... quesiton is, as it's not a legitimate license, does it's "use" give it notability. If so, this needs re-writing to explain it more clearly.
SkierRMH05:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep. To my surprise I found this all over the net - 34,000 Google hits, with a high percentage seeming to reference this particular meaning. Article needs work though.
Herostratus05:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak keep The fact that there are so many hits from Google seems to suggest that it is at least partly notable - whether it is notable enough, however, is still questionable.
Chairman S.TalkContribs06:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep: I have added sources, as well as a sourced quote from
Bradley Kuhn the first FSF associate, and links to a repository of WTFPL software and art. It's not the MOST notable liscensing format out there, but recognition of validity from the
Free Software Foundation and active use tell me it's notable.
Wintermut319:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.