- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 13:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- W. A. Ginn ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim to notability at all. Fails WP:POLITICIAN and only one source. Forced to AfD because of deprod without any explanation. Rusf10 ( talk) 02:31, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to the list of mayors like the other short bios. -- RAN ( talk) 02:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose redirect, W.A. Ginn is not a likely search term and violates WP:COMMONNAME-- Rusf10 ( talk) 03:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Also, if you wanted a redirect, why did you deprod this???--
Rusf10 (
talk)
03:09, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Now that is an excellent question! Comment user was not banned when he expressed his opinion. gidonb ( talk) 20:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete because subject fails notability criteria. - The Gnome ( talk) 05:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 07:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete subject fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer talk 16:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails the GNG. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Biography of an individual in an otherwise unnotable position; looks like a failure of NPOL to me. TheGracefulSlick ( talk) 23:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Ashland KY is nowhere near large enough to hand its mayors an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL #2 just for existing, but the article is not sourced anywhere close to well enough to actually get him over the bar. Bearcat ( talk) 18:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.