The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable politician?. Most of the coverage is of a school he is associated with. Does not meet
WP:NPOL.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 16:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sarahj2107 (
talk) 07:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Kiev is certainly a large and prominent enough city that its city councillors would clear
WP:NPOL #2 if they were sourced properly, but it's not a position that exempts him from having to pass
WP:GNG for it. This is referenced almost entirely to
primary sources and
YouTube videos rather than to
reliable source coverage in media — and, for added bonus, it's written like somebody tried (badly) to convert his
résumé into prose rather than like an actual encyclopedia article. As always, Wikipedia is not a free PR database on which every local politician is entitled to an article just because he exists; reliable source coverage must be present to support an article.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.