The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I checked all the RS-compliant references given in the article and none supports the claims that the subject is that party's spokesperson. All the references are incidental mentions or contributor profiles on citizen journalism portals. Also, the article is so full of
WP:PUFFERY that it would require a rewrite from scratch even if better sources are miraculously found. —
kashmīrīTALK12:25, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - The article has been previously deleted for no independent sources, no evidence of notability, autobiography. The article has been recreated without any improvements.--___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk12:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - The current referencing is mostly primary sources or article by, not about, Dalmia. The Forbes article is a contributor article which essentially means that there has been no editorial oversight exercised by Forbes on the content, and is it is in essence a glorified blog post. I can find no coverage about this person to establish notability. -
Whpq (
talk)
14:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.