From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Vic Dibitetto

Vic Dibitetto (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable youtube comedian. I'm seeing only local coverage and a bunch of non-independent links. Stuartyeates ( talk) 01:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (commune) @ 20:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (parlez) @ 20:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (parlez) @ 20:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The "local coverage" appears to be isolated to the United States east coast, with significant and frequent coverage in New Jersey and New York media. These are newspapers and radio stations with potential audiences of millions. He also appears to have won a national television contest ( America's Funniest People). Pburka ( talk) 23:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Per above with the coverage issue. Also, I think the biggest complaint is that the article predicts Vic's success in the future. But we DO know he is going to have a large role in a movie for sure. He also does quite a bit of stand-up comedic work at major resorts in Las Vegas and Atlantic City. His YouTube channel has over 25 million views and tens of thousands of subscribers. I think the nom does not give good enough support to the lack of notability. PrairieKid ( talk) 23:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Vic has a significant role in Mall Cop 2. He is seen on the trailers and appears to be a key character alongside Kevin James. This exposes him to millions of people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.94.173.136 ( talk) 23:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC ( talk) 19:18, 8 January 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Tom Morris ( talk) 23:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The fact that the article doesn't have much information doesn't mean that it lacks notability. As long as there are enough secondary sources, it's worth keeping.-- TMD Talk Page. 01:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.