The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)reply
A mayor of a town of 5000 people with no other political credentials doesn't constitute notability. He only has an article as one of his predecessors was Sarah Palin, and I expect all major news coverage of him will be in respect to this.
Computerjoe's talk 17:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree completely with the nominator, this is only because of Palin, and notability is not inherited.
Dianne M. Keller,
John Stein (mayor),
List of mayors of Wasilla, Alaska and Category:Mayors of Wasilla, Alaska are all just window dressing, created after Palin came to national attention. We shouldn't list every small town mayor in the United States, Palin didn't have an article until she became governor. It's interesting to note that the
Anchorage Daily News actually ran a story about how nobody really cared about the election that brought him to office
[1].
Beeblebrox (
talk) 19:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 00:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Weak delete Merely being the mayor of a town a governor or VP candidate is from/was mayor of doesn't grant notability. So unless someone puts forward an independent basis of notability, I'll have to go with delete. --PhilosopherLet us reason together. 20:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.