- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Veena S
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Veena S ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NPOL; WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO.
Sole sources (per my searches) are this and this. ∯WBG converse 12:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 12:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they didn't win, and merely being "one of" the first members of an underrepresented group to do an otherwise non-notable thing is not a free golden ticket to special-case status either. To be considered notable for this, she would have to show a significantly higher volume of media coverage than just three footnotes, in a significantly higher class of media outlets than just user-generated citizen journalism projects. Bearcat ( talk) 22:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:52, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, per nominator: no evidence that this individual meets GNG or NPOL. Vanamonde ( Talk) 16:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as does not pass WP:NPOL, needs to win a significant election Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.