- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yes there very likily will be an article about this game in the future, but for now it is a WP:CRYSTALHAMMER. If you want to redirect F1 201 (video game) so be it, however I don't see this title as a viable search term. kelapstick( bainuu) 11:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Untitled eighth-generation Codemasters Formula One project
- Untitled eighth-generation Codemasters Formula One project ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an obvious WP:CRYSTAL case - Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements. There is no content in this article, the author doesn't even have a name. The only source is a blog post in which this project is briefly mentioned. - hahnch e n 13:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 1000 13:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:HAMMER. ansh 666 17:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete When someone from the company doesn't know the name of the product at all? Maybe that's saying 'don't create an article about it yet'. WP:CRYSTAL and what company has ever put out a new product then said 'hey, we got this coming out soon, thanks for the free $60 on this inferior product, sucker'? Nate • ( chatter) 17:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:HAMMER. Sergecross73 msg me 17:26, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:HAMMER 69.166.78.85 ( talk) 17:31, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: The project is notable as it is the first Formula One game on an eighth-generation console. Its development was closely tied to F1 2014 to the point where it directly affected F1 2014. The article name is representative of the way the game will be a departure from other titles in the series. If the article was still called F1 2015, the person nominating the article for deletion would not have bothered; the only reason why there is an AfD in the first place is because he didn't get his way in the article. There has been no consultation with any editors involved in related articles, so this whole thing amounts to IDONTLIKEIT. The developer has already given details of when an announcement will be made (which cannot be included for obvious reasons), which will come to pass in the space of about a week. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 21:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete this is WP:TOOSOON, technically the article does not currently pass WP:N. There is no need to jump the gun with articles so soon after the merest scrap of information becomes available. MarvellousMeatpuppet ( talk) 22:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- Move to draft (will leaving a redirect) until name will be clear. 178.93.237.66 ( talk) 12:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Codemasters (or Formula One video games) after moving back to F1 2015 (video game). Blah, blah, yes, hammer. "F1 2015 (video game)" is a worthwhile search term and there are a few sentences to extract from:
- to plop at either Codemasters or Formula One video games. Better than outright deletion for not knowing its name. czar ♔ 01:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - I'd say keep, we will soon be finding out more about this game and the page will just have to be recreated, keep it and we will build upon it as information is released. CDRL98 ( talk) 19:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.