The result was delete. It appears that not enough is known about this period to make such an article verifiable or not original research. Sandstein 06:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The claim of an "unknown ruler" may not hold up. Most of the Net research I've uncovered places the reign of Orodes I through the period given to this anonymous man. Here is an example that supports Orodes' reign being longer than the time that our articles have alloted him: [1]. Any Persian history scholars are welcome to chime in and establish notability. Ecoleetage ( talk) 03:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I think what we may need here is an article instead on the Parthinian Dark Age, which is at least verifiable, and in that article it can be verified that numismatic sources indicate that either one or two unknowns may have ruled in or about 80 - 77 B.C, but that the exact line of succession is unclear; it isn't called a dark age for nothing.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 12:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC) reply"...so that it appears that in Babylonia in 90 b.c., a ruler called Gotarzes (I) was expelled by another called Orodes (I); the latter was in turn forced to give way to some further prince in 80 b.c..." (emphasis added).