The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article is about (wait for it...) a website on a fictitious institution that cloned
Reed College's website in 2011, possibly as a scam to collect application fees. Reed fought to have it taken down, generating some news coverage at the time, but there has been no enduring coverage post-2011, and this fundamentally fails
WP:NOTNEWS/
WP:TYT. The only ATD would be redirecting to Reed, but I don't think it'd be due for a mention in the history section there, so I'd lean toward straight deletion. {{u|Sdkb}}talk03:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - seem inherrently lacking in notability (only notability is inherited from a real institution taking action against it) - and fundamentally it would be a terrible precedence if faked websites were considered notable.
JMWt (
talk)
07:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Reed has a 115 years of (rather colorful) history to cover in
summary style in
its history section, so there's a high bar for inclusion. The section is currently heavily weighted toward early history, but even if it were balanced out to featured-quality weighting, I think a mention of this would stick out. When I was writing FA
Pomona College § History, which has a comparably old history, the sort of news event that warranted a one-line mention was a campus building getting bombed. If this had gone to the Supreme Court or something, that'd be one thing. But this? The college sent out a copyright infringement notice, and the media picked it up as an (at-that-time) novel use of the internet, but without any enduring coverage I don't see how it rises to the level of being
due for that section. {{u|Sdkb}}talk14:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I will defer to your evaluation of the article in terms of merging. I don't have any particular attachment to the content per se, but it's one of those small things that could be folded into an article at some point, so I'd like to preserve history with an ATD. If you think it would be misleading to redirect to
Reed College, we could possibly redirect to
phishing or
internet fraud, or redirect to
Redwood (disambiguation) as a pointer to any of those? —
siroχo21:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.