The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:15, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply
This has been speedy deleted and prod-deleted, it's time to get a full community consensus. Ultimately, there are no reliable sources establishing the notability of an organization- in this case, a student club. There are two possible sources given: the first is from the school newspaper. the second (an article at thestreet.com) is certainly a great source for establishing notability and encyclopedic "fit" of the article. However, that doesn't mean that it meets the rule of "significant coverage". That means this article is hinging on one decent source (with respect to WP:V).
Let me use a poor argument to make my point: specifically, I'll use WP:BIG. That is, if this was a private investment group or fund, a million dollars wouldn't qualify for an article. It's effectively play money: each of the 30 members is responsible for about $33,000 of the fund. That's a tiny number.
It's possible that these university investment clubs would be notable if the (theoretical multiple) secondary sources were collected and an article about University investment clubs was written. That doesn't mean an individual club is encyclopedic, though. tedder ( talk) 16:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC) reply