- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 16:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Udini Square ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-descript suburban mall. Other than routine coverage, nothing to show this particular mall is notable. Onel5969 TT me 23:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Adequate references from credible, third-party sources, indicative of its notability. This is one of the newer shopping malls on Penang Island, by the way, which is also strategically located at a growing suburban area. Vnonymous ( talk) 23:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep my experience recently has been that most large malls are found notable, even if the only references are arguably WP:MILL. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 00:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - In the absence of a notability guideline on shopping malls, appears to satisfy general notability marginally, and shopping malls probably usually do. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, malls commonly have notability as many people will go there everyday. angys ( Talk Talk) 08:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Unjustified nomination for deletion, as the subject is notable in Penang. As pointed out, the subject's notability is backed by a number of third-party sources. If it fulfills general notability, why the subject is nominated for deletion is beyond me. Semi-auto ( talk) 23:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.