From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn per improvements.

Tuberculosis in popular culture

Tuberculosis in popular culture (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Huge sprawling list of trivia. No sourcing found. No attempt has been made to turn this into a viable article. Ten Pound Hammer( What did I screw up now?) 03:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Looking at all the Wikipedia articles that are "in popular culture" [1] I'm surprised to see how many there are. Odd to see the one about sharks listing every cartoon that sometimes had sharks in it. Anyway, this article shows what major literary works used this as a plot device, as well as how common it appeared back when it was a major problem. Shawn in Montreal has found reliable sources giving it coverage, so it meets the notability guidelines. Dream Focus 03:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC) reply
TenPoundHammer The article is now fully restructured, supported by 32 reliable sources, and illustrated with major artworks that depict the disease. Hope you're pleased with the result. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.