The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Triangle Films

Triangle Films (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP and the GNG. No independent reliable sourcing. Since the claimed awards aren't sufficient to make the film involved notable, they certainly don't suffice to make the studio that released it notable. Nor does swiping the name of a long defunct, but one major, film studio confer notability. PROD tendentiously removed without explanation or article improvement by article creator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. ( talk) 14:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP & sources are not there to meet GNG. K.e.coffman ( talk) 17:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Lacks independent reliable source coverage required by WP:CORP. Porn trade coverage consists of republished press releases and an obituary for one of the company's founders. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.