The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Trans man. Merge as appropriate. czar 17:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)reply
This seems to be a
content fork of
trans man. Apart from the lead, it only duplicates (poorly) the content of other articles related to transsexuality. It is not clear from what seems to be
the only on-point source whether this is meant to describe something qualitatively different from
trans man, or merely the adjectival form of the topic, in which case this is not more than a dictionary entry. If there are terminological nuances, they should be covered in the
trans man article. Sandstein 13:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Trans man. Most of the references are not about this term or trivial. Nothing appears to be distinct that justifies another article, indeed, some references support the synonymy of the two terms.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 04:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.