The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Suggest merger into the article found by
Andrew Lenahan, good catch. I think it's been reworded enough to not be a true copyright violation, especially since legal standards are being discussed, and language for them tends to resist paraphrase. The information here would make that stub a lot more informative. -
Smerdis of Tlön (
talk)
14:14, 25 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Note also
International (Nice) Classification of Goods and Services, which has a more accessible title and a list of signatories, but little info on the actual classes. I think that Nice is the most important grouping of classes, but we would want to make sure there aren't any significant ones outside the WIPO agreement and note them. I think that in its present form there's nothing worth keeping as a separate article, so merge to
Trademark for now. --
Dhartung |
Talk22:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.