From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Total Conquest

Total Conquest (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dime a dozen free to play video game, no third-party references. Proposed deletion was removed by the article's creator. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 06:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk ☻ 08:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as failing WP:GNG with multiple independent in-depth reliable sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Only in-depth reliable source I can find is [1]. Various review hits in unreliable sources. Insufficient sources for an article. —   HELLKNOWZ  ▎ TALK 16:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. The only reliable source with in-depth coverage I could find was the same one that Hellknowz found. -- ferret ( talk) 02:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Certainly questionably better, WP:TNT at best if better is ever available. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Procedural note. Article was titled Total conquest at beginning of AfD process. It was just moved to Total Conquest. — C.Fred ( talk) 04:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.