From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Doko Demo Issyo. The Wordsmith Talk to me 20:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC) reply

AfDs for this article:
Toro Inoue (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure if this passes GNG after trying to find a good source at google search; the birthday party and a pride thing are the only useful sources. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 12:39, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Create Doko Demo Issyo and redirect there I searched for Japanese articles about Toro Inoue and the ones I found are primarily about the Doko Demo Issyo series which he is the mascot of. [1] [2] We don't have an article for that series, but I would support creating that article and having this page redirect there. TarkusAB talk/ contrib 17:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    The question is whether the series is mentioned as a whole in sufficient RS. I've found a couple for various games in the series, but never enough to meet GNG. Also this is dismissing the fact that he is most likely a notable character. If the series is also notable, both can exist. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 21:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    The two sources I linked discuss the series directly and in detail. A series article would be a good central place to talk about the games as well as Toro. TarkusAB talk/ contrib 21:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    It does seem like the series is notable, but you have yet to say whether you believe Toro himself is notable. It's pretty common to have articles on both a series and their protagonist, I don't see why this would be an exception to the rule. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 09:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    Zx, with respect, you always seem to be under the impression that if a subject is notable by Wikipedia's definition, then a stand-alone article is justifiable without exception. We can assess each case independently on whether it is merited ("presumed" part of GNG). I do think that Toro is a "notable" subject (in the general sense of the term), but it's a weak case for a stand-alone Wikipedia article. The sources you listed are all short blurbs, except the article about his (and other characters') birthday event. There isn't much to say about him; the article would be short. Given the fact that Doko Demo Issyo is the parent subject, and Toro is often discussed in context of the series, I think it would be more effective to have one article about the series and its games, with a section about Toro as sort of being a legacy of the series. TarkusAB talk/ contrib 19:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    I'm not sure what's so odd about thinking that - WP:NOTMERGE says that merging should be avoided if "The topics are discrete subjects warranting their own articles, with each meeting the General Notability Guidelines, even if short." Your entire argument hinges around articles being too short, which the page explicitly says should not be used as a rationale unless they are "one or two sentences" long, which is much shorter than the current state of the article, much less its potential size when expanded. The point is that merging is entirely up to personal opinion/consensus, but there is no rule requiring short notable articles to be merged unless people decide it so. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ) 07:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply
    I never said there were any rules in play, you did. That's why I responded the way I did. Anyways, I would not call these subjects "discrete". TarkusAB talk/ contrib 09:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Restructure per Tarkus' suggestion. I feel given the unique nature of this subject that may be the best route.-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 21:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Animal. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on creating a separate article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.