The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Tom Kerry (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kerry was involved with a political party. It is unclear that he ever ran for office, ever held a clear office, or was ever more than a minor public figure. The sourcing we have here, a website basically trying to document as many people connected with this political movement as possible, is enough to show notability. The sourcing clear does not rise to the multiple reliable sources that are indepdent of the subject and each other, and secondary while giving in-depth coverage, that we need to justify an article. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 12:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Massachusetts. Shellwood ( talk) 13:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete Thoroughly fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Sal2100 ( talk) 22:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete. The article's sole reference is an unreliable source, and the article states absolutely nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have anything better. Bearcat ( talk) 17:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete - fails WP:SIGCOV by a wide margin. Bearian ( talk) 16:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.