The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 07:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Ting Tai Fook (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned WP:BLP (and likely WP:AUTOBIO — see creator's username) of a political figure, who has no valid claim to passing WP:NPOL and no strong reliable source coverage to support it. The only political office he's claimed to have held is "state youth chairman" for a political party, which is not an office that passes NPOL -- a person has to hold office in a legislature, not a political party's internal org chart, to get an automatic presumption of notability just for existing; being the youngest holder of an otherwise non-notable office counts for nothing toward making him more notable than the norm; and being a non-winning candidate in a legislative election doesn't assist either. And for sourcing, all we have here is one piece of reliable source coverage, which is not enough to deem him notable under WP:GNG despite his lack of an NPOL pass. Bearcat ( talk) 05:21, 2 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 06:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 06:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 06:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Other than hits from The Star and Malay Mail Online about his appointment, I couldn't find enough coverage about him in reliable sources apart from passing mentions. If he was the youth chief of the party as a whole rather than just in Perak, I would have at suggested maybe a redirect to a Malaysian Chinese Association-related article, but that's not the case. At best, this could be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new}
• Keep - We need one that can understand Malaysian's Politic landscape. Don't discourage new editor. If there is a mistake to rectify, please let me know. I am happy to learn. [[ Ting.pkkbn ( talk) 04:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)]] reply

— Ting.pkkbn ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Delete It's WP:TOOSOON based on his political career; as stated above he doesn't meet WP:NPOL. The article is written as a personal bio and isn't worth keeping in draft form. Power~enwiki ( talk) 04:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep - How admin determine it is TOOSOON? Is it a neutral response? Becoming a Politician in Malaysia begin from Political Party career. I know TING personally and he is actively servicing his community in the past 9 years. Wikipedia is a universal platform use to promote fair use of Useful Article. It is not necessarily a global interest of Wikipedians. Total population in Lumut is 80,000 persons.

We need one that can understand Malaysian's Politic landscape. Don't discourage new editor. If there is a mistake to rectify, please let me know. I am happy to learn. [[[User:Ting.pkkbn|Ting.pkkbn]] ( talk) 06:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)] reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.