The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Did you get any coverage other than someone online or a porn channel talking you to about porn? Which notable shows did you have a significant role in? Something not porn related.
DreamFocus21:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't talk to you anymore. You are clearly not listening. I won't repeat myself over and over again just for you. Pretty much everything is listed in the
press coverage link I already posted. And yes, mainstream media like
Klub Konkret,
Hamburger Morgenpost and
Hamburger Abendblatt talk with me about porn, no shit, who would have thought? I'm a porn star. Your "argument" is like saying: "But Jeff Bezos only talks about Amazon, that doesn't count". And regarding the shows I already posted the IMDb link but apparently you are not willing to click it. I'm out of here. I'm done wasting my time with you. Enjoy the rest of the discussion. --
Till Kraemer (
talk)
22:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Taboo fields of work are often shunned from mainstream outlets, yes, but those facing such adverse conditions should still be treated with respect as opposed to potentially being chastised. But that's
just my two cents and perhaps I misinterpreted the tone. sex work is work! —
Godsy (
TALKCONT)09:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)reply
delete fails
WP:PORNBIO both by deprecated and current standards. He never won any awards, never received coverage (being nominated isn't a win and doesn't confer notability) and all the supposed coverage is primary/press releases or interviews.
GRINCHIDICAE🎄22:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
There are literally no press releases and yea, no shit, these are mostly interviews, what's the problem? Also, since nobody clicks my links apparently, I'm gonna list some examples of coverage here:
Akte 06 (
Sat.1), Endstation Pornofilm: Wenn Männer keine Arbeit finden
Akte 06 (Sat.1), Pornostar sucht Partner: Auf der Suche nach der großen Liebe
Bild, Pornopedia: Sexstar Till Kraemer (32) gründet geile Enzyklopädie
Bild, Früher Sex-Drehs, heute Waschzwang: Ein Pornostar geht in Rente
Delete Seems to be an autobiography, supported by sources that are primary, unreliable, or that give no depth of coverage. I'm not seeing sources thay would pass the GNG bar.
GirthSummit (blether)22:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Till Kraemer,
WP:INTERVIEWs are usually considered as primary sources for the purposes of establishing notability. What GNG calls for is multiple sources which tick all of the necessary boxes: reliable, independent, secondary, and depth of coverage. Sources which tick some, but not all, don't cut it. Best
GirthSummit (blether)23:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Pornbio was a horrid criteria that served to create inordinately high numbers of articles in Wikipedia connected with porn. It was deprecated. What is needed now is passing the slightly more stringent rules of GNG. The weight of inertia however has kept on Wikipedia a lot of unjustified articles related to people involved in pornography.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
20:04, 22 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - I will attempt to help build consensus, as this discussion caught my eye due to the repetitive arguments supplied by Mr. Kraemer. I agree with the "delete" voters above on the lack of
independent and reliable coverage. Kraemer certainly appears in a lot of online media but it is largely self-promotional and unreliable, and no longer eligible for notability after the recent rejection of the
WP:PORNBIO standards. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 21:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.