The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment In the case of Heiress I actually would support a merge, as it currently has one single to its credit + one forthcoming album, all by the same artist. ThugLine has a more substantial base, but I've actually weakened my keep as I can only find a small number of notable albums on the label. I don't think it merits deletion, but perhaps if an appropriate merge target can be found...
GassyGuy18:27, 29 June 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. While it might be related to established artists, until they've got more than one release (uh, and even the one there hasn't dropped yet, right?) then it's not notable. Onwership by notability doesn't cause notability: I'm sure the guys from BOne Thugs own homes, too, but that doesn't make those homes notable enough for their own articles. --
Mikeblas12:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)reply
No, but
WP:MUSIC says that their side projects are. It's referring to other bands they are in, but I don't see why other labels that they own shouldn't count too.
Recury13:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)reply
They actually already have a few releases... Thug on Da Line, Gemini: Good Vs. Evil, It's Not a Game ... maybe more. Like I said before, it's not a lot, but it seems enough to stay. I would still support a merge if an appropriate target can be found, but, barring that...
GassyGuy18:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.