From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory ( utc) 21:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Thomas Walls (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and notability criteria for politicians and judges. The only source in the article is a blog and I can not find anything else in reliable sources. Jbh Talk 21:06, 14 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 21:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 21:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Jbh Talk 21:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. The "inherent" notability of government cabinet ministers attaches to the cabinets of real established countries with real diplomatic recognition, not to the self-appointed governments of virtually unrecognized micronations whose only established diplomatic relationship is with one other unrecognized polity, and no reliable source coverage has been shown to get him over WP:GNG as an individual in lieu. Bearcat ( talk) 22:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Not enough coverage to pass GNG (per Bearcat). At the very/absolute most, redirect to Liberland ( he exists). -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 03:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete a partially recognized place is one like Kosovo, or maybe Abkazia, the latter having peaked at 6 nation recognition (it has since receded to 4), not counting another 3-4 non-recognized places. Abkazia also actually controls territory etc. The nation here lacks recognition by any place that has a role in its area. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Liberland is not a country, it is not a "partially recognized place," it is an intellectual prank. Thomas Walls is one of the pranksters. I's glad he and his buddy are having fun with this , but he fails WP:BASIC WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG for dearth of sources. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 13:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.