The result was nomination withdrawn, snowball keep. While the conditions of WP:SPEEDYKEEP have not been exactly met, it's abundantly clear at this point that there is a consensus to keep these articles. Beeblebrox ( talk) 03:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Unsourced sub-stub or a 16th century Member of Parliament (in the pre-1707 Parliament of England), no evidence of any possibility of expansion. This is not an article, it is a list entry, and I see no reasonable prospect of expansion beyond a one-line stub. It should be deleted without prejudice to re-creating it if and when someone has some sources to write even a meaningful stub article.
Per WP:POLITICIAN, Members of Parliament are presumed to be notable ... but notability of a topic does mean that it is any way helpful to the reader to create a one-line sub-stub article which says no more than can be found at Tamworth_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#MPs_1660-1885. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 07:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all unsourced one-line sub-stubs with no reasonable prospect of expansion:
All of the "articles" in this nomination were PRODded by me, and in each case the PRODs were contested by the creator, who edits under 3 accounts and switches between them frequently: Boleyn ( talk · contribs), Boleyn2 ( talk · contribs) and Boleyn3 ( talk · contribs). -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 08:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep I've just expanded it slightly, and they all have room for expansion. It being very short isn't grounds for deletion, it meets WP:POLITICIAN - efforts should be made to expand rather than delete a notable person's article. Boleyn2 ( talk) 08:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep - So we are now deleting stubs en masse?. What next start class articles? Why not make a rule only FA class articles can exist in wikipedia. At which point does the nom accept something as an article?. no evidence of any possibility of expansion. Cursory google searches reveal enough sources for expansion -- Sodabottle ( talk) 08:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply