- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Thomas Alvord
- Thomas Alvord ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Promotional article, part of a trio of articles created by this SPA on this company. See Funded Today and Zach Smith. MB 02:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Agree that subject doesn't meet WP:GNG, and that creator of article ( User:Munozmayo) appears to be a WP:SPA to promote Funded Today and its leadership. See WP:PROMOTION. Lwarrenwiki ( talk) 04:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:37, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comment — Note that the other two closely related articles by this WP:SPA were deleted yesterday, for reasons identical to those proposed here, based on similar (but more thorough) discussions and consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funded Today and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Smith. Lwarrenwiki ( talk) 15:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment – Seems to me that there's so little discussion because it's not needed: this is now a fairly uncontroversial delete, uncontested, and consensus already exists. Lwarrenwiki ( talk) 11:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC) rev. 12:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, seems to be a little WP:TOOSOON, i.e., there is coverage, but not profiles and coverage is in minor publications and some of the linked articles are brief menitons. Nor are any of his companies bluelinked. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 17:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.