The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 11:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Theo Germaine

Theo Germaine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of an actor, not yet reliably sourced as clearing WP:NACTOR. A person has to have multiple significant roles, not just one, if you're going for "notable because they've been in stuff", and a person has to have considerably more than just one reference if you're going for "notable because they have press coverage". No prejudice against recreation in the future when there are more roles and better sourcing, but as of right now one significant supporting role supported by a single source is not enough. Bearcat ( talk) 21:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 21:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 21:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep, I quickly found sourcing, including that this is one of three bigger roles for the actor, and interviews with him that would easily make a good article, which I think meets WP:GNG. Gleeanon409 ( talk) 21:18, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 21:34, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 21:34, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 21:36, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep (disclaimer: article creator), per WP:GNG. Oprah magazine, Reuters, Them, South China Morning Post, Chicago Tribune, Marie Claire, Gay Times, etc. Article needs expanding, but serves as an appropriate stub for now, IMO. --- Another Believer _{( Talk)} 22:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep a WP:BEFORE reveals WP:RS. passes WP:GNG Lightburst ( talk) 02:13, 18 October 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep - added some more sources and minor info to the article -- Spacepine ( talk) 08:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Nominator did not follow WP:BEFORE. Passes WP:SIGCOV. 4meter4 ( talk) 03:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.