The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Paper has been published for over a century and a half. That does it: all these AfDs by this editor will be speedily kept. They are bad-faith nominations from a politically motivated editor who didn't practice due diligence (
WP:BEFORE). I future speedy keeps I will refer to this motivation.
Drmies (
talk) 00:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Does not appear to be notable based on sourcing.
Herp Derp (
talk) 22:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.