From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

The Problem of the Media (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a non-notable subject, cant find any references except amazon listings, etc, nothing suggests that it was discussed even narrowly by much of anyone. Insert CleverPhrase Here 19:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, I found 3 reviews of the book in major peer-reviewed journals:
  1. Atkinson, J. (2008). Robert W. McChesney. The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the 21st Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2004, 367 pp., ISBN  1583671056 (paperback). Mass Communication & Society, 11(1), 109-112. doi: 10.1080/15205430701769358
  2. Cumiskey, K. H. (2005). [The Problem of the Media]. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 284-286. doi: 10.5860/crl.66.3.284
  3. Herrick, D. F. (2004). [The Problem of the Media]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 949-951. doi: 10.1177/107769900408100413
Moreover, as per WP:TEXTBOOKS the book is highly cited in the literature (~865 citation according to Google scholar), and is published by a major academic publisher NYU Press.
Yazan ( talk) 22:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Well, I have to say, good work indeed. I should have thought to look in academic sources for reviews, oh well, live and learn. Add these to the article and I'll happily withdraw the nomination. Insert CleverPhrase Here 23:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Sorry for the misunderstanding, but I didn't intend to 'hand out assignments'. I'm withdrawing it either way, but was a bit busy when I commented above. Just a request, no need to be assume the worst. Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.