The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
OK, I don't know about this change in the result (well, I do know); this AfD might have gone different if different things had been known at different times. As it is, I ran into this, restored it, and added references to show notability.
Drmies (
talk)
01:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
It's not really clear whether this is an academic journal or a magazine (it looks like this was a peer-reviewed journal and then morphed into an online newsletter/magazine). In any case, there is no evidence that it meets any inclusion guidelines. There are no independent sources (I am discounting the cited listings in the Library of Congress Catalog and JSTOR, which do not constitute in-depth coverage), so this does not meet
WP:GNG. The journal is not covered in any selective databases, so it does not meet
WP:NJournals either. In the absence of any evidence that this is notable: Delete.
Randykitty (
talk)
10:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.