The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  16:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC) reply

The House That Jack Built (2018 film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See film notability guidelines, which state that films in production are only notable if the production itself is notable. This article does not state anything notable about the production, and Google search does not find anything about the production except that the film is in production. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep Per WP:NFILM, movies that have begun filming but not yet been released are notable when " the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." The production section of the article easily meets the GNG. More could go into it regarding pre-production, but the article was literally just created, and I don't have the time to expand it right now.(<--Done!) -- Irn ( talk) 05:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment - All that the article says about production is that the film is in production. Not every film production is notable. If the author doesn't have time (more than 24 hours after creating the article) to expand the article to show that the production is notable, maybe it isn't notable or may be WP:TOOSOON. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC) reply

As I quoted above, according to NFILM, the "Production" section of the article must meet the GNG. According to the GNG, notability means having "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The "Production" section of the article easily fulfills that requirement. (If you follow the link for "the production itself" it tells you that this includes "development of the concept and script [...] the securing of financing and producers [...] recruitment of the most important artists (cast and crew) [... and] actual filming—dates and places", all of which is addressed in the article's "Production" section.) -- Irn ( talk) 14:14, 11 March 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep Per Irn. There is enough coverage by independent sources for the work to be notable. The notability guideline also states that a film can be reasonably considered notable when it "features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person", and Lars von Trier is most certainly a notable filmmaker. AndrewOne ( talk) 02:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.