The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I did find
this listing and it was mentioned in
this article, these are not enough to establish notability for the film. This article suffers from the same issues that the other sock creations do - it's full of various claims that cannot be substantiated by any reliable source that would pass muster and given that there are concerns of false claims and even hoaxes with the other articles, I'd say that it would be best to delete this and create a redirect after the issues with the main Chaney article have been resolved.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。)05:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. I would agree with the others above. I'm pretty sure that it exists, but that's not really enough for an article. Most of the hits I'm seeing are from an old Tarzan film. It doesn't even seem to have been indexed in most film databases, such as
Allmovie or
Baseline. I'm thinking this was probably an obscure limited release or direct-to-video film that never really got any attention. If I'm wrong, then the article can always be recreated with better evidence of notability.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
18:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.