The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. There is some sentiment for merging to the author or the story collection, but no clear consensus to do that or which target would be better.
RL0919 (
talk)
20:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)reply
There doesn't seem to be any particular reason why this particlar story should have an article., and no reason why it should have even a redirect, DGG (
talk )
06:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Question / Tentative Keep - Is there a wiki-project with special notability guidelines for short stories? I note that this article is sourced with contemporary criticism in what I presume are reliable sources... that suggests meeting the notability criteria to me.
Fieari (
talk)
07:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Dangerous Visions - The reviews currently in the article are just one to two sentence mentions in larger reviews of the collection its in overall. Searching for more sources turns up more of the same - brief mentions in discussions of Dangerous Visions. I don't think this is enough coverage to support an independent article, but Redirecting it to the notable book collection it appeared in would make sense.
Rorshacma (
talk)
19:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep There's sufficient, well referenced content, and the page about the anthology would become unwieldy if we merged in all the pages for its constituent stories.
pburka (
talk)
14:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: I found
a snippet in Google Books that implies that it was reviewed in
Galaxy Science Fiction per the phrase "the vantage Cross's “ The Doll House ” was point from which we peek out written pretty much to one of through them". I think that this was the same one that I added to the article to back up a quote made about how they were submitted. The general gist seems to be that the article goes into some depth about the story.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79)
(。◕‿◕。)14:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.