The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: At the time that I am writing this comment, there are only a few sources that support the commercial performance of this album. Is there more information about the actual album itself outside of the chart performance to represent that it has received more coverage?
Aoba47 (
talk)
20:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Weak keep: The album has charted and some links were provided to show that this has been covered by outside sources. I think more sources should be added to this in the future, but I also believe that this article should be kept.
Aoba47 (
talk)
15:21, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. There's a bit more coverage
here. At worst it should be merged to the band article. Given that the deletion rationale focused only on article quality I'm surprised this has stayed open so long. --
Michig (
talk)
08:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.