The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Technically ineligible for soft deletion, but this has been open for three weeks and it does not appear any input is forthcoming and there is no argument present to keep the article. Star Mississippi 02:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Film appears to fail WP:NFILM, as only 1 book source cited and no others found in a BEFORE. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: as it's ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 19:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)