The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I prodded this with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing
Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed
Wikipedia:Notability (books) supplement.
WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." (I'll add that I see snippets in an anthology or two introducing this, possibly written by the anthology or magazine editors that can be a bit independent, but I cannot confirm there is any
WP:SIGCOV). It was deprodded with no useful rationale, so let's discuss this here. Can anyone find anything to save this? If not, the best
WP:ATD would be to redirect this to the anthology
Dangerous Visions or the author
Keith Laumer. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here08:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: What I'm finding so far has been mentions in relation to the main anthology, Dangerous Visions. This could probably just redirect to the main article for that.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79)
(。◕‿◕。)01:49, 18 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment, have been unable to find
reviews on this story/novelette, unfortunate that there is no article on Laumer's wikinotalbe anthology A Plague of Demons (1965, not just 2003:)), so a redirect to Dangerous Visions (1967) looks like the way to go.
Coolabahapple (
talk)
02:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.