- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. While the consensus is to keep this article the nominator does bring up the fact that this article is unsourced and could use some attention. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Terzake ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references or sources, and does not prove any notability. Zekerocks11 ( talk) 03:58, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Belgium. Zekerocks11 ( talk) 03:58, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep A longtime news program that has aired in Belgium since 1994. Of course it needs sources, but notability ought not be an issue. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A ( talk) 22:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Honest question, did you do a
WP:BEFORE check at all, @
Zekerocks11:? Because a quick Google search brings up plenty of sources. Remember,
WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP, just because an article isn't in great shape doesn't mean the subject isn't notable.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK
22:19, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- And I will give an honest reply, I did not even see that page when I did my scan over. I apologize in advance and I'll give it a look over. Zekerocks11 ( talk) 22:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.