The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 03:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)reply
This politician looks like he's notable (though I haven't checked thoroughly), but an editor has reverted my challenge of a
A7 tag on it, so I'm bringing discussion here.
Ritchie333(talk)(cont) 23:37, 14 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. He's a pretty big nobody. Nothing notable about him.
Me-123567-Me (
talk) 23:45, 14 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Under
WP:NPOL, leaders of fringe political parties are allowed to have articles on Wikipedia if they can be
properly sourced enough to pass
WP:GNG as an individual — but being a party leader is not a notability freebie that entitles a person to keep an unsourced or poorly sourced article just because they exist(ed). The sourcing here is inadequate at best, and the article does not make a strong claim that he's notable for anything else besides leading a fringe party. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 00:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: Looks like the career of a nobody politician trying desperately to be somebody and failing. Fails WP:BIO going away. And I wouldn't even say he's "led" a fringe party, unless declaring yourself the "head" of a "party" that never gets registered counts. Nha TrangAllons! 13:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per everybody that voted.
Coconuts31 (
talk) 02:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.