The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton |  ^Talk 02:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Ted Hayes (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:BASIC. Kurykh ( talk) 20:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete. There are claims here that could get him a Wikipedia article if it were significantly better sourced than this, but as written this article is based far too strongly on primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things, and not nearly enough to reliable source coverage about him. Bearcat ( talk) 17:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.