The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Promotional piece of a non notable YouTuber sourced to press releases. Having x number of subscribers on YouTube doesn't make anyone notable by default. The article was previously declined by
JavaHurricane at AfC due to lack of independent coverage and was later deleted as
WP:G7.
Umakant Bhalerao (
talk)
15:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Hello there respected editors thanks for your concern about an article written by me it's about very famous YouTuber and Media Personality Techno Gamerz, and I have gone through all the instructions mentioned by you and have cited many references and I think this page should not be deleted because it's about one of the biggest Indian Gamer and YouTuber and I think he is very notable and I humbly request you to please remove this tag also I want to tell you that last time when this page was created by someone else it lacked information but this time I have gone through all the instructions thoroughly, And about reliable sources, so I just want to tell you that many reliable newspapers and websites have published many articles about Techno Gamerz for example-The Indian Express, The Economic Times, and India.com etc. Thank you very much for your time. Yours Sincerely
Pranay Dongre 27 (
talk) 2:36, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep: It passes the
WP:GNG and is covered by reliable sources. I didn't look at some of the sources properly, which are promotional posts. –– 𝚅𝚁𝙹𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞 09:54, 23 June 2021 (UTC) –– 𝚅𝚁𝙹𝙱𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚑𝚞05:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete and salt, promoted for months on Wikipedia by multiple sockpuppets of at least one, possibly two paid editing outfits. As for how it was moved from AfC – it never went through an AfC review, and if it had, it definitely wouldn't have passed. --bonadeacontributionstalk20:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.