The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep now that the article has been improved and there are no serious concerns for AfD (NAC).
SwisterTwistertalk 23:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
There is no proof of notability, and the article was apparently created by a sock of the indeffed
user:Neptunekh who has be forbidden from creating categories, for which see the user's talk page history.
μηδείς (
talk) 03:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)reply
In addition to the fact that this article seems to have been created by an indeffed sock
User:Mito9999 of the indeffed
user:Neptunekh, it began as a cut and paste
copyvio and no other source has been given.
μηδείς (
talk) 03:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)reply
I nominated this article only because one the main contributors,
User:Neptunekh, who is a notorious sockmaster, is well-known to me. I otherwise have no opinion on the dubious notability of the subject, although someone should check the copyright status of any to be retained material.
μηδείς (
talk) 03:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Fine, then I hope folks will look to
my attentions as a
non-involved editor which establish it as meeting the criteria of
WP:NF. And as it has now been
improved by someone uninvolved and not-a-sock, let's not dwell on how it got here. Thanks.Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: enough sources have been added to show this is a notable and prize-winning film.
Chiswick Chap (
talk) 13:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep, why is this still open? Keep it per
WP:HEY, actual sourcin makes this film notable beyond any reasonable doubt.
Cavarrone 20:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.