The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Greenbörg (talk) 07:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Tariq Amin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 16:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

• Week delete he has recently received some press coverage related to PIA... but i don't think he's notable enough to warrant an article here. -- Saqib ( talk) 16:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 16:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep Appears to have coverage in multiple sources, some starting points: [1] [2]. Mar4d ( talk) 18:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep - I find the sources found by Mar4d to be a compelling demonstration that this subject passes GNG. Carrite ( talk) 11:37, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.