The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar  ⨹ 15:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Sydney Moscoe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable only as a school trustee and an unsuccessful candidate for higher office, neither of which is a claim of notability that gets a person over WP:NPOL. Although the article is sourced, nothing here is actually outside of the ordinary level of purely local media coverage that all school trustees always get — meaning that none of it provides any actual reason why he would warrant permanent coverage in an encyclopedia with an international audience. This is basically a leftover from a time (2006) when our notability standards for politicians were a lot looser than they are now, but NPOL has been tightened up considerably over the years and he doesn't pass it as things stand in 2014. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 21:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 21:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 21:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:16, 25 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete School board members are not automatically notable and his coverage is just the routine reporting of his school board activities--nothing to show encyclopedic notability. 131.118.229.17 ( talk) 21:53, 25 November 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete Low level of coverage, doesn't seem worth keeping. -- Cerebellum ( talk) 07:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.